Sex, drugs, and STIs: Syphilis infection and hepatitis B vaccine compliance among illicit drug users in Houston

Although the association between syphilis infection status and compliance with the hepatitis B virus vaccine has been the focus of investigation, there is a lack of data regarding the association between syphilis infection and HBV vaccine compliance. The author investigated the association between the exposure of syphilis infection and the outcome of HBV vaccine completion, defined as degree of constancy and accuracy with which a patient follows a prescribed regimen. A cohort design was employed using interview and serological data from the Drugs, AIDS, STDs, Hepatitis (DASH) Research Project; analysis was restricted to HIV and HBV seronegative (at baseline), illicit drug users residing in Harris County. Syphilis negative and syphilis positive infection status was determined from the serological data while covariates and outcome information were determined from the DASH Project Questionnaire; enrolled subjects (n=1160) were selected from the data. Association between exposure and outcome was assessed with logistic regression adjusted for data-based confounders. ^ A prevalence of 7% and 71% was found for syphilis and HBV vaccine compliance, respectively. When measuring the actual association between syphilis infection status and HBV vaccine compliance, an odds ratio of 1.49 (95% CI: 0.86, 2.72) was obtained. There was a non-significant association between these two variables. 78% of the study population was syphilis positive and completed the vaccine series compared to 70% of the population that was syphilis negative and received all three doses. This finding confirms that there is a difference between syphilis positive and negative drug users with respect to HBV vaccine compliance. The fact that differences were found in these drug users with respect to vaccine schedule supports the idea that sub-group differences may exist and thus merits further investigation. If these differences are confirmed, it is recommended that STI interventions identify community characteristics of their samples and target populations based on practices specific to that community. ^

Mapping T-cell epitopes of the rubella virus structural proteins

Rubella virus (RV) typically causes a mild childhood illness, but complications can result from both viral and immune-mediated pathogenesis. RV can persist in the presence of neutralizing antibodies, suggesting that cell-mediated immune responses may be necessary for viral clearance. However, the molecular determinants recognized by RV-specific T-cells have not been identified. Using recombinant proteins which express the entire RV structural open reading frame in proliferation assays with lymphocytes of RV-immune individuals, domains which elicit major histocompatibility complex class II-restricted helper T-cells were identified. Synthetic peptides representing these domains were used to define specific epitopes. Two immunodominant domains were mapped to the capsid protein sequence C$\sb1$-C$\sb{29}$ and the E1 glycoprotein sequence E1$\sb{202}$-E1$\sb{283}.$ RV-specific MHC class I-restricted cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) were identified using a chromium-release assay with infected fibroblasts as target cells. An infectious Sindbis virus vector expressing each of the RV structural proteins identified the capsid, E2 and E1 proteins as targets of CTLs. Specific CTL epitopes were mapped within the previously identified immunodominant domains. This study identified domains of the RV structural proteins that may be beneficial for development of a synthetic vaccine, and provides normative data on RV-specific T-cell responses that should enhance our ability to understand RV persistence and associated complications. ^

Gene therapy of cancer: Mechanisms of ``bystander effect'' killing in cells expressing the herpes simplex virus-thymidine kinase gene and its potential clinical applications

At the fore-front of cancer research, gene therapy offers the potential to either promote cell death or alter the behavior of tumor-cells. One example makes use of a toxic phenotype generated by the prodrug metabolizing gene, thymidine kinase (HSVtk) from the Herpes Simplex Virus. This gene confers selective toxicity to a relatively nontoxic prodrug, ganciclovir (GCV). Tumor cells transduced with the HSVtk gene are sensitive to 1-50 $\mu$M GCV; normal tissue is insensitive up to 150-250 $\mu$M GCV. Utilizing these different sensitivities, it is possible to selectively ablate tumor cells expressing this gene. Interestingly, if a HSVtk$\sp+$ expressing population is mixed with a HSVtk$\sp-$ population at high density, all the cells are killed after GCV administration. This phenomenon for killing all neighboring cells is termed the "bystander effect", which is well documented in HSVtk$\sp-$ GCV systems, though its exact mechanism of action is unclear.^ Using the mouse colon carcinoma cell line CT26, data are presented supporting possible mechanisms of "bystander effect" killing of neighboring CT26-tk$\sp-$cells. A major requirement for bystander killing is the prodrug GCV: as dead or dying CT26tk$\sp+$ cells have no toxic effect on neighboring cells in its absence. In vitro, it appears the bystander effect is due to transfer of toxic GCV-metabolites, through verapamil sensitive intracellular-junctions. Additionally, possible transfer of the HSVtk enzyme to bystander cells after GCV addition, may play a role in bystander killing. A nude mouse model suggests that in a 50/50 (tk$\sp+$/tk$\sp-$) mixture of CT26 cells the bystander eradication of tumors does not involve an immune component. Additionally in a possible clinical application, the "bystander effect" can be directly exploited to eradicate preexisting CT26 colon carcinomas in mice by intratumoral implantation of viable or lethally irradiated CT26tk$\sp+$ cells and subsequent GCV administration. Lastly, an application of this toxic phenotype gene to a clinical marking protocol utilizing a recombinant adenoviral vector carrying the bifunctional protein GAL-TEK to eradicate spontaneously-arisen or vaccine-induced fibrosarcomas in cats is demonstrated. ^

Lessons learned from nationwide vaccine programs: Comparing human papillomavirus, poliomyelitis vaccine, and swine flu

This assessment compares the human papillomavirus (HPV) nationwide vaccine to the poliomyelitis vaccine and the swine flu vaccine with the purpose of finding parallels and lessons in the controversies faced by the development and use of the vaccines. There are a number of great barriers that are facing the HPV vaccine to date. These controversies lie in dealing with the risk involved in taking the vaccine, how much control the government should have in administering the vaccine, how to communicate the risk to the public, and the cost-effectiveness of the vaccine versus treatment for cervical cancer. The lessons for the HPV vaccine that were learned after comparison and assessment of the controversies were: (1) plan ahead of time on how to inform the public if a risk develops from taking the HPV vaccination and it may be better to provide some information while the event is occurring, always being as truthful as possible, and later dispensing more information once all of the facts are known, (2) the human papillomavirus is not something that will become a pandemic in a short amount of time because the virus takes a long time to develop into cervical cancer, so if a major risk begins to show after continuing to develop and administer the vaccine for an amount of time, it may be better to take it off the market for a while and possibly reconfigure it to help eliminate some of the risks, (3) if side reactions and risks do develop and the government assumes liability for these reactions, the cost-effectiveness can be greatly affected, so it is important to be constantly checking to see if all the monetary and health benefits of the vaccine are outweighing any of the negative costs of the vaccine, and lastly, (4) the public must feel that every aspect of the vaccine, both good and bad, has been thought over and the benefits of taking the vaccine prevail over the negatives and that politics and commercial interests have nothing to do with the production and administration of the vaccine. ^